Rankin v. Lightsey

Fourth Circuit

Rankin v. Lightsey

92 F. App'x 961

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2004·No. No. 04-6028·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Andre Rankin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rankin v. Lightsey, No. CA-02-483-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Andre Rankin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rankin v. Lightsey, No. CA-02-483-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Rankin v. Lightsey, 92 F. App'x 961 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

92 F. App'x 961 (Rankin v. Lightsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related