Rankin v. Lightsey
This text of Rankin v. Lightsey (Rankin v. Lightsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6028
KEVIN ANDRE RANKIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH LIGHTSEY, Doctor,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JENNY CRAIG; M. BOONE, sued in their individual capacities; SELMA TOWNES, sued in her individual capacity and official capacity,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-02-483-5-H)
Submitted: March 15, 2004 Decided: April 12, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Andre Rankin, Appellant Pro Se. Dana Hefter Davis, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Kevin Andre Rankin appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rankin v.
Lightsey, No. CA-02-483-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rankin v. Lightsey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rankin-v-lightsey-ca4-2004.