Rankin v. Laclede Gas Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rankin v. Laclede Gas Co.

388 S.W.3d 599, 2012 WL 6599407, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1604

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 2012·No. No. ED 98410·Published

Opinion

[600] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Rankin appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission's decision is supported by substantial and competent evidence. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[600] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Rankin appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission's decision is supported by substantial and competent evidence. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Rankin v. Laclede Gas Co., 388 S.W.3d 599, 2012 WL 6599407, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1604 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

388 S.W.3d 599 (Rankin v. Laclede Gas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related