Rankin v. Ballance

Illinois Supreme Court

Rankin v. Ballance

13 Ill. 706

DecidedJune 15, 1852

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ill. 706 (Rankin v. Ballance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rankin v. Ballance, 13 Ill. 706 (Ill. 1852).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion must prevail. There is now no judgment to be affirmed or reversed. The various rulings of the Circuit Court have in effect been set aside. The cause is now pending for trial de novo in that court. If the judgment had been affirmed on the appeal, the plaintiff in error might still prosecute his writ of error, and have his exceptions considered. But the exceptions fell with the judgment. The writ of error will be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion must prevail. There is now no judgment to be affirmed or reversed. The various rulings of the Circuit Court have in effect been set aside. The cause is now pending for trial de novo in that court. If the judgment had been affirmed on the appeal, the plaintiff in error might still prosecute his writ of error, and have his exceptions considered. But the exceptions fell with the judgment. The writ of error will be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Ill. 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rankin-v-ballance-ill-1852.