Ranjha v. Holder

Fourth Circuit

Ranjha v. Holder

544 F. App'x 208

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2013·No. No. 13-1206·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rubina Ranjha, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and Ranjha’s claims and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2013). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ranjha, (B.I.A.Jan.18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rubina Ranjha, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and Ranjha’s claims and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2013). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ranjha, (B.I.A.Jan.18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Ranjha v. Holder, 544 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

544 F. App'x 208 (Ranjha v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related