Raniere v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Raniere v. State

198 A.D.2d 795, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1016

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1993·No. Claim No. 77489·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: There is no merit to claimants’ contention that the trial court’s findings are contrary to the weight of evidence. The resolution of issues of credibility is peculiarly within the province of the finder of fact (see, Hess v Zoological Socy., 134 AD2d 824, 825; Mikula v Duliba, 94 AD2d 503, 508), and there is no basis in this record to disturb the trial court’s resolution of issues of credibility in favor of the State. (Appeal from Judgment of Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J. — False Arrest.) Present — Denman, P. J., Balio, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: There is no merit to claimants’ contention that the trial court’s findings are contrary to the weight of evidence. The resolution of issues of credibility is peculiarly within the province of the finder of fact (see, Hess v Zoological Socy., 134 AD2d 824, 825; Mikula v Duliba, 94 AD2d 503, 508), and there is no basis in this record to disturb the trial court’s resolution of issues of credibility in favor of the State. (Appeal from Judgment of Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J. — False Arrest.) Present — Denman, P. J., Balio, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Raniere v. State, 198 A.D.2d 795, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1016 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

198 A.D.2d 795 (Raniere v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related