Rangel v. State
644 So. 2d 616, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11162, 1994 WL 645475
This text of 644 So. 2d 616 (Rangel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rangel v. State, 644 So. 2d 616, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11162, 1994 WL 645475 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
Opinion
The motion filed in the trial court by appellant, pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, was not properly verified under oath. Gorham v. State, 494 So.2d 211 (Fla.1986); Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987. Accordingly, the motion was legally insufficient. Therefore, the order is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gorham v. State
494 So. 2d 211 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Scott v. State
464 So. 2d 1171 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
644 So. 2d 616, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11162, 1994 WL 645475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rangel-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.