Rangel v. State
644 So. 2d 616, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11162, 1994 WL 645475
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rangel v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 692 So. 2d 277 →
Opinion
The motion filed in the trial court by appellant, pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, was not properly verified under oath. Gorham v. State, 494 So.2d 211 (Fla.1986); Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987. Accordingly, the motion was legally insufficient. Therefore, the order is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rangel v. State, 644 So. 2d 616, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11162, 1994 WL 645475 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
644 So. 2d 616 (Rangel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gorham v. State
494 So. 2d 211 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Scott v. State
464 So. 2d 1171 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)