Rangel, Jose Arrez

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 16, 2020
DocketWR-91,949-01
StatusPublished

This text of Rangel, Jose Arrez (Rangel, Jose Arrez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rangel, Jose Arrez, (Tex. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,949-01

EX PARTE JOSE ARROZ RANGEL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W09-53959-N(A) IN THE 195TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fifth Court of

Appeals affirmed his conviction. Rangel v. State, No. 05-11-00604-CR (Oct. 30, 2012). Applicant

filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

On Oct. 6, 2020, the State filed a response stating that it needed additional time to investigate

Applicant’s allegation concerning a letter from its Public Integrity Division that disclosed an

alternative suspect’s potentially favorable post-conviction statement. The State further asserted that

it intended to file a supplemental response with the trial court after additional investigation. The

record before this Court reflects no further activity. The district clerk properly forwarded this application to this Court under Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 73.4(b)(5). However, the application was forwarded before the State completed

its investigation and before the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law. We remand

this application to the trial court to complete its evidentiary investigation and make findings of fact

and conclusions of law.

The State shall complete its investigation and submit its supplemental response, and the trial

court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, within ninety days from the date of this

order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s findings and

conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things, affidavits, motions,

objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from hearings and depositions.

See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and

obtained from this Court.

Filed: December 16, 2020 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rangel, Jose Arrez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rangel-jose-arrez-texcrimapp-2020.