Rangel, Jose Arrez
This text of Rangel, Jose Arrez (Rangel, Jose Arrez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,949-01
EX PARTE JOSE ARROZ RANGEL, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W09-53959-N(A) IN THE 195TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fifth Court of
Appeals affirmed his conviction. Rangel v. State, No. 05-11-00604-CR (Oct. 30, 2012). Applicant
filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk
forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
On Oct. 6, 2020, the State filed a response stating that it needed additional time to investigate
Applicant’s allegation concerning a letter from its Public Integrity Division that disclosed an
alternative suspect’s potentially favorable post-conviction statement. The State further asserted that
it intended to file a supplemental response with the trial court after additional investigation. The
record before this Court reflects no further activity. The district clerk properly forwarded this application to this Court under Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 73.4(b)(5). However, the application was forwarded before the State completed
its investigation and before the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law. We remand
this application to the trial court to complete its evidentiary investigation and make findings of fact
and conclusions of law.
The State shall complete its investigation and submit its supplemental response, and the trial
court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, within ninety days from the date of this
order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s findings and
conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things, affidavits, motions,
objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from hearings and depositions.
See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and
obtained from this Court.
Filed: December 16, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rangel, Jose Arrez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rangel-jose-arrez-texcrimapp-2020.