Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Range v. State

Range v. State

40 So. 3d 68, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9876, 2010 WL 2671960
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 7, 2010
Docket1D10-0639
StatusPublished

This text of 40 So. 3d 68 (Range v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Range v. State, 40 So. 3d 68, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9876, 2010 WL 2671960 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant concedes that the notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction with this Court has been untimely filed. See St. Moritz Hotel v. Daughthry, 249 So.2d 27 (Fla.1971). We therefore dismiss this appeal as it is untimely.

DISMISSED.

HAWKES, C.J., BENTON, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Moritz Hotel v. Daughtry
249 So. 2d 27 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 So. 3d 68, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9876, 2010 WL 2671960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/range-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.