Range v. Culbertson
This text of 32 A. 24 (Range v. Culbertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from the refusal of the court below to open a judgment, and requires an examination of the evidence rather than of any legal question. We have examined the evidence as it appears upon the paper-books. The learned trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses and hearing them. His conscience was not moved by the testimony, and we are not inclined to disturb his conclusion.
The appeal from his refusal to open the judgment is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 A. 24, 168 Pa. 324, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/range-v-culbertson-pa-1895.