Range Co. v. . Cozart

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Range Co. v. . Cozart

24 S.E. 356, 118 N.C. 342

DecidedFebruary 5, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 24 S.E. 356 (Range Co. v. . Cozart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Range Co. v. . Cozart, 24 S.E. 356, 118 N.C. 342 (N.C. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

This case is governed by the opinion in the above case againstCarver. But it does not appear that any claim for county tax is involved; and as the defendant was restrained and enjoined by the order below from collecting the State tax imposed by (343) section 28, chapter 116, Laws 1895, the order was erroneous and should not have been granted. There is error, and the judgment is

Reversed. *Page 210

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case is governed by the opinion in the above case againstCarver. But it does not appear that any claim for county tax is involved; and as the defendant was restrained and enjoined by the order below from collecting the State tax imposed by (343) section 28, chapter 116, Laws 1895, the order was erroneous and should not have been granted. There is error, and the judgment is

Reversed. *Page 210

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 S.E. 356, 118 N.C. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/range-co-v-cozart-nc-1896.