Range Co. v. . Cozart
24 S.E. 356, 118 N.C. 342
Opinion
This case is governed by the opinion in the above case againstCarver. But it does not appear that any claim for county tax is involved; and as the defendant was restrained and enjoined by the order below from collecting the State tax imposed by (343) section 28, chapter 116, Laws 1895, the order was erroneous and should not have been granted. There is error, and the judgment is
Reversed. *Page 210
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Range Co. v. . Cozart, 24 S.E. 356, 118 N.C. 342 (N.C. 1896).
24 S.E. 356 (Range Co. v. . Cozart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.