Raney v. State
This text of 29 Fla. Supp. 2d 119 (Raney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
In this case the Defendant appeals after entering a no contest plea without having established on the record the dispositiveness of the denial of his pretrial motion to suppress. This he cannot do. State v. Carr, 438 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1983). As in another case citing this principle, Weber v. State, 492 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), the Trial Court incorrectly told the defendant he could appeal. However this only will allow the defendant a basis to move to set aside the plea.
[120]*120This Court also notes that there seems to be no abuse of discretion in the Trial Court’s denial of the Motion to Suppress.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 Fla. Supp. 2d 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raney-v-state-flacirct-1988.