Raney v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Federal Circuit

Raney v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

168 F.3d 21, 1999 WL 52382

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 11, 1999·No. Nos. 97-3469, 98-3043·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The appeals, having been heard by a panel of the court and, thereafter, a majority of circuit judges in regular active service having acted sua sponte in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §46(c) and Fed. R.App. P. 35(a),

IT IS ORDERED that the appeal shall be decided in banc.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that new briefs shall be filed. Petitioner’s principal brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order. The dates for filing the remaining briefs shall be in accordance with Fed. Cir. R. 31(a). An original and 30 copies of all briefs shall be filed and two copies shall be served on opposing counsel.

Oral argument will be scheduled in due course.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The appeals, having been heard by a panel of the court and, thereafter, a majority of circuit judges in regular active service having acted sua sponte in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §46(c) and Fed. R.App. P. 35(a),

IT IS ORDERED that the appeal shall be decided in banc.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that new briefs shall be filed. Petitioner’s principal brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order. The dates for filing the remaining briefs shall be in accordance with Fed. Cir. R. 31(a). An original and 30 copies of all briefs shall be filed and two copies shall be served on opposing counsel.

Oral argument will be scheduled in due course.

Raney v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 168 F.3d 21, 1999 WL 52382 (Fed. Cir. 1999).

Pincite

168 F.3d 21 (Raney v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related