Randy—The Salon v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Randy—The Salon v. New York State Division of Human Rights

198 A.D.2d 921, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1023

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Randy—The Salon v. New York State Division of Human Rights. Read the opinion of the Court — 201 A.D.2d 901 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1993·Published

Opinion

Motion for permission to file and serve reply brief denied. Memorandum: The motion is unnecessary. On October 1, 1993, the Court granted respondent’s motion to strike appellants’ brief with leave to refile. After a proper appellants’ brief is filed and served and responded to, appellants will have the opportunity to file a timely reply brief. Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed Oct. 25, 1993.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for permission to file and serve reply brief denied. Memorandum: The motion is unnecessary. On October 1, 1993, the Court granted respondent’s motion to strike appellants’ brief with leave to refile. After a proper appellants’ brief is filed and served and responded to, appellants will have the opportunity to file a timely reply brief. Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed Oct. 25, 1993.)

Randy—The Salon v. New York State Division of Human Rights, 198 A.D.2d 921, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

198 A.D.2d 921 (Randy—The Salon v. New York State Division of Human Rights) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.