Randy—The Salon v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Randy—The Salon v. New York State Division of Human Rights

198 A.D.2d 921, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1023

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 921 (Randy—The Salon v. New York State Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randy—The Salon v. New York State Division of Human Rights, 198 A.D.2d 921, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for permission to file and serve reply brief denied. Memorandum: The motion is unnecessary. On October 1, 1993, the Court granted respondent’s motion to strike appellants’ brief with leave to refile. After a proper appellants’ brief is filed and served and responded to, appellants will have the opportunity to file a timely reply brief. Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed Oct. 25, 1993.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for permission to file and serve reply brief denied. Memorandum: The motion is unnecessary. On October 1, 1993, the Court granted respondent’s motion to strike appellants’ brief with leave to refile. After a proper appellants’ brief is filed and served and responded to, appellants will have the opportunity to file a timely reply brief. Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed Oct. 25, 1993.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 921, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randythe-salon-v-new-york-state-division-of-human-rights-nyappdiv-1993.