Randy Thomas v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 10, 2025·No. 3D2025-0968·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed September 10, 2025.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D25-0968

Lower Tribunal Nos. F05-29247, F06-22915, F14-840

Randy Thomas,

Petitioner,

vs.

State of Florida,

Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.

Randy Thomas, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER and GOODEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Randy Thomas filed a petition for habeas corpus asserting ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Finding none of his claims meet the standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), we deny the petition. See Rutherford v. Moore, 774 So. 2d 637, 644 (Fla. 2000) (“The failure to raise meritless claims does not render appellate counsel’s performance ineffective.”); Kokal v. Dugger, 718 So. 2d 138, 142 (Fla. 1998) (“Appellate counsel cannot be faulted for failing to raise a nonmeritorious claim.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Randy Thomas v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Randy Thomas v. State of Florida (Randy Thomas v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Kokal v. Dugger
718 So. 2d 138 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Rutherford v. Moore
774 So. 2d 637 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)