Randy Teter v. Daniel Bettes
Opinion
Missouri inmate Randy Teter appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his.motion for a new trial after the district court entered judgment for defendants following a jury trial. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in. denying the motion. See Patterson v. City of Omaha, 779 F.3d 795, 800-01 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R., 47B.
. The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
667 F. App'x 891 (Randy Teter v. Daniel Bettes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.