Randy Teter v. Daniel Bettes

Eighth Circuit

Randy Teter v. Daniel Bettes

667 F. App'x 891

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedAugust 9, 2016

Docket15-3463

StatusUnpublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 891 (Randy Teter v. Daniel Bettes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randy Teter v. Daniel Bettes, 667 F. App'x 891 (8th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Randy Teter appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his.motion for a new trial after the district court entered judgment for defendants following a jury trial. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in. denying the motion. See Patterson v. City of Omaha, 779 F.3d 795, 800-01 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R., 47B.

1

. The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Randy Teter appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his.motion for a new trial after the district court entered judgment for defendants following a jury trial. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in. denying the motion. See Patterson v. City of Omaha, 779 F.3d 795, 800-01 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R., 47B.

1

. The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 F. App'x 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randy-teter-v-daniel-bettes-ca8-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack