Randy Scott v. State
Opinion
NO. 07-12-00406-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
OCTOBER 17, 2012
IN RE R. WAYNE JOHNSON, RELATOR
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, R. Wayne Johnson, appearing pro se, has filed a petition seeking a writ
of mandamus 1 requiring respondent, the Honorable Gordon H. Green, Judge of the
287th District Court of Bailey County, to rescind a November 2011 order dismissing the
claims Johnson filed in the case styled Johnson v. Denton, No. 8972 (287th Dist. Ct.
Bailey County, Tex. Nov. 18, 2011). Johnson perfected an appeal from the trial court’s
November 2011 order, but later filed a motion to dismiss the appeal voluntarily. On his
motion, we dismissed the appeal by opinion and judgment of July 18, 2012. Johnson v.
Denton, No. 07-11-00486-CV, 2012 Tex. App. Lexis 5794 (Tex.App.--Amarillo July 18,
2012, no pet.). According to Johnson’s mandamus petition, the trial court’s order was
not final.
1 Johnson included in his petition a motion to transfer this proceeding to another court of appeals. By order of the Supreme Court of Texas, the motion was denied. Misc. Docket No. 12-9160 (Tex. Sept. 27, 2012). We now deny mandamus relief. Johnson’s petition wholly fails to comply with the
requirements of appellate rule 52.3. Tex. R. App. P. 52.3. Further, it does not
demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion by Judge Green. See Walker v. Packer, 827
S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992) (explaining “[m]andamus issues only to correct a clear
abuse of discretion”).
Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Randy Scott v. State (Randy Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.