Randy Patterson v. Attorney Grievance Commission

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 29, 2015·No. 150085·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 29, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

150085 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

RANDY PATTERSON, Plaintiff,

v SC: 150085 AGC: 0031-13

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

By order of June 3, 2015, the Attorney Grievance Commission was directed to provide a supplemental response to the complaint for superintending control. On order of the Court, the supplemental response having been received, the complaint for superintending control is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2015

a0921

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Randy Patterson v. Attorney Grievance Commission, (Mich. 2015).

Randy Patterson v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Randy Patterson v. Attorney Grievance Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.