Randy Patterson v. Attorney Grievance Commission
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 29, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Stephen J. Markman
Mary Beth Kelly
150085 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack
David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstein,
Justices
RANDY PATTERSON, Plaintiff,
v SC: 150085 AGC: 0031-13
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
By order of June 3, 2015, the Attorney Grievance Commission was directed to provide a supplemental response to the complaint for superintending control. On order of the Court, the supplemental response having been received, the complaint for superintending control is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
September 29, 2015
a0921
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Randy Patterson v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Randy Patterson v. Attorney Grievance Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.