Randy Gene Brazeal v. State
This text of Randy Gene Brazeal v. State (Randy Gene Brazeal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-05-0222-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
NOVEMBER 1, 2005
______________________________
RANDY BRAZEAL,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
_________________________________
FROM THE 47 TH DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;
NO. 16,715-A; HON. HAL MINER, PRESIDING
_______________________________
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and HANCOCK, JJ.
Appellant, Randy Brazeal, appeals his theft conviction. However, the record does not contain a certification of his right to appeal as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d). By letter dated September 9, 2005, this court notified the trial court, the district clerk, the district attorney and appellant’s attorney of this omission and the need for the certification. More than 45 days have lapsed since all were notified of these circumstances, and the certification has yet to be filed. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d) (requiring that the appeal be dismissed if a certification that shows that the defendant has a right to appeal has not been made part of the record).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Randy Gene Brazeal v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randy-gene-brazeal-v-state-texapp-2005.