Randy Dingle v. Walter Edmond, Superintendent Victor C. Freitas, Sergeant Robin Martin, Officer

12 F.3d 204, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36708, 1993 WL 491279
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 19, 1993
Docket93-7021
StatusUnpublished

This text of 12 F.3d 204 (Randy Dingle v. Walter Edmond, Superintendent Victor C. Freitas, Sergeant Robin Martin, Officer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Randy Dingle v. Walter Edmond, Superintendent Victor C. Freitas, Sergeant Robin Martin, Officer, 12 F.3d 204, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36708, 1993 WL 491279 (4th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

12 F.3d 204

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Randy DINGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Walter EDMOND, Superintendent; Victor C. Freitas, Sergeant;
Robin Martin, Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-7021.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 25, 1993.
Decided Nov. 19, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Rockingham, No. CA-93-220; Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge.

Randy Dingle, pro se.

William McBlief, North Carolina Dept. of Justice, Raleigh, NC, for defendants-appellees.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Dingle v. Edmond, No. CA-93-220 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

The parties consented to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (West 1993)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 F.3d 204, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36708, 1993 WL 491279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randy-dingle-v-walter-edmond-superintendent-victor-c-freitas-sergeant-ca4-1993.