Randy Cole v. Michael Hunter
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 14-10228 FILED _____________________ February 8, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk RANDY COLE; KAREN COLE; RYAN COLE,
Plaintiffs - Appellees v.
CARL CARSON,
Defendant - Appellant
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- cons. w/No. 15-10045
RANDY COLE; KAREN COLE; RYAN COLE,
MICHAEL HUNTER; MARTIN CASSIDY,
Defendants - Appellants
__________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas __________________________
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion September 25, 2015, 5 Cir., 2015, 802 F.3d 752) (Opinion on Remand from U.S. Sup.Ct. September 25, 2018, 5 Cir., 2018, 905 F.3d 334) No. 14-10228 c/w No. 15-10045
Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON, COSTA, WILLETT, HO, DUNCAN, ENGELHARDT, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Randy Cole v. Michael Hunter (Randy Cole v. Michael Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.