Randy B Haney v. Kathleen a Haney
This text of Randy B Haney v. Kathleen a Haney (Randy B Haney v. Kathleen a Haney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
January 2, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 160176 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement RANDY B. HANEY, Megan K. Cavanagh, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 160176 COA: 342019 Oakland CC: 2012-802803-DO KATHLEEN A. HANEY, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 23, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 2, 2020 s1216 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Randy B Haney v. Kathleen a Haney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randy-b-haney-v-kathleen-a-haney-mich-2020.