Randolph v. US Attorney General

Fourth Circuit

Randolph v. US Attorney General

594 F. App'x 140

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 18, 2015·No. No. 14-2193·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Randolph v. Attorney Gen., No. 1:14-cv-03298-GLR (D.Md. Oct. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Randolph v. Attorney Gen., No. 1:14-cv-03298-GLR (D.Md. Oct. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Randolph v. US Attorney General, 594 F. App'x 140 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

594 F. App'x 140 (Randolph v. US Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related