Randolph v. U.S. Attorney
This text of 615 F. App'x 124 (Randolph v. U.S. Attorney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaints for failing to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. U.S. Attorney of Md., No. 1:15-cv-01137-JFM (D. Md. filed Apr. 30, 2015; entered May 1, 2015); Randolph v. Lynch, No. 1:15-cv-02005-JFM, 2015 WL 4249395 (D.Md. July 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
615 F. App'x 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randolph-v-us-attorney-ca4-2015.