Randolph v. United States

598 F. App'x 179
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 19, 2015
DocketNo. 14-2397
StatusPublished

This text of 598 F. App'x 179 (Randolph v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Randolph v. United States, 598 F. App'x 179 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-03609-JFM (D.Md. Dec. 12, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [180]*180materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
598 F. App'x 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randolph-v-united-states-ca4-2015.