Randolph v. State

650 So. 2d 1051, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 88, 1995 WL 7702
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Randolph v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 608 So. 2d 573
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 11, 1995·No. No. 92-2799·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Alfred Randolph, was tried by jury and convicted of two counts of petit theft and one count of grand theft. His case was assigned to the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit’s special habitual felony offender division of the circuit court. Appellant was declared an habitual felony offender and sentenced to ten years in state prison on the grand theft charge and to sixty days for each of the petit theft counts. In accordance with Hartley v. State, 650 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), we affirm appellant’s conviction, but vacate the ten year sentence for grand theft and remand for re-sentencing before a different [1052]*1052trial judge. We have considered the other issues raised by appellant and find no error.

POLEN, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Randolph v. State, 650 So. 2d 1051, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 88, 1995 WL 7702 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

650 So. 2d 1051 (Randolph v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hartley v. State
650 So. 2d 1044 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)