Randolph v. Smith

328 F. App'x 194
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 14, 2009·No. No. 08-1676·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sandra B. Randolph appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendant on Randolph’s claims of racial discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. New Hanover County Registrar of Deeds, No. 4:06-cv-00233-FL (E.D.N.C. May 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Randolph v. Smith, 328 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2009).

328 F. App'x 194 (Randolph v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.