Randolph v. Randolph

Supreme Court of Virginia

Randolph v. Randolph

3 Va. 99

DecidedMarch 16, 1812

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Va. 99 (Randolph v. Randolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randolph v. Randolph, 3 Va. 99 (Va. 1812).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Roane

pronounced the Court’s opinion, that, “ on the ground that the sale of the slave in the proceedings mentioned, was admitted by the bill, and established by the testimony, and there was no evidence adequate to prove the reservation set up, on the part of the appellant, (and not on that stated by the Chancellor,) the decree is correct; and this the rather, because the appellant saw it proper to dispense with the answer of the appellee, Isham Randolph, (who [102]*102was a party, and privy to the whole transaction,) by setting the cause down for trial, without his answer.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Roane

pronounced the Court’s opinion, that, “ on the ground that the sale of the slave in the proceedings mentioned, was admitted by the bill, and established by the testimony, and there was no evidence adequate to prove the reservation set up, on the part of the appellant, (and not on that stated by the Chancellor,) the decree is correct; and this the rather, because the appellant saw it proper to dispense with the answer of the appellee, Isham Randolph, (who [102]*102was a party, and privy to the whole transaction,) by setting the cause down for trial, without his answer.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Va. 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randolph-v-randolph-va-1812.