Randolph v. Peck & Co.

4 Ala. 389
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1842
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Ala. 389 (Randolph v. Peck & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Randolph v. Peck & Co., 4 Ala. 389 (Ala. 1842).

Opinion

ORMOND, J.

This was a proceeding in the Court below commenced by the defendants in error, plaintiffs in a judgment against Thomas B. Archer, by process of garnishment against the plaintiff in error, upon which they obtained judgment against him by default, for failing to appear and answer, which was afterwards confirmed and final judgment rendered.

The-assignments of error present several grounds for reversal, but it is only necessary to examine one which is decisive of this case. The plaintiff in error was summoned as a garnishee, to appear within the first four days of the term of the County Court of Greene county, to be held on the fourth Monday in May, 1S39. The record shows that on the 29th of May, which was Wednesday, the third day of the term, a conditional judgment was rendered against the garnishee, for failing to appear and answer, which judgment was afterwards made final.

[390]*390The statute, [Aik. Dig. 12, §19,] allows to the garnishee the first four days of the term to appear and answer, and upon his failing so to appear and answer, authorizes the rendition of a conditional judgment against him.. The judgment in this Case being rendered before the time had elapsed, within which the garnishee could appear and answer, is void, and for this error the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Ala. 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randolph-v-peck-co-ala-1842.