Randolph v. Clifton T. Perkins Hospital Center

395 F. App'x 46
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 14, 2010·No. No. 10-6372·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Catherine D. Randolph appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. Clifton T. Perkins Hosp. Ctr., No. 1:10-ev-00284-JFM, 2010 WL 672844 (D.Md. Feb. 19, 2010). We deny Randolph’s emergency petition for review, as well as her motions for appointment of counsel, stay pending appeal, and an expe[47]*47dited decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Randolph v. Clifton T. Perkins Hospital Center, 395 F. App'x 46 (4th Cir. 2010).

395 F. App'x 46 (Randolph v. Clifton T. Perkins Hospital Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.