Randolph v. Bayles
This text of 3 N.J.L. 52 (Randolph v. Bayles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Delivered by Kirkpatrick, C. J. So far as it relates to the cost of suing out the ca sa, let it be set aside. The act gives no costs upon reversals of judgments in cases of certiorari. But so far as it goes to recover the costs, adjudged to the defendant below) and actually paid to him by the plaintiff, let it stand, it being money which the defendant has recovered in consequence of an illegal judgment, it must he restored.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 N.J.L. 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randolph-v-bayles-nj-1806.