Randolph v. Baldin
491 S.W.3d 265, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 273, 2016 WL 1105793
This text of 491 S.W.3d 265 (Randolph v. Baldin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Randolph v. Baldin, 491 S.W.3d 265, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 273, 2016 WL 1105793 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).
Opinion
Order
James Randolph appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendants, Christine and Anthony Baldin, in Randolph’s action for trespass and nuisance. The trial court determined that Randolph lacked standing to assert his claims because Randolph failed to show that he had legal possession or ownership of the property at issue. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
491 S.W.3d 265, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 273, 2016 WL 1105793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randolph-v-baldin-moctapp-2016.