Randolph v. Baker

• Court: District Court, D. Nevada
• Decided: January 9, 2024
• Docket: 2:18-cv-00449
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 Rene L. Valladares 2 Federal Public Defender Nevada State Bar No. 11479 3 *Shelly Richter 4 Assistant Federal Public Defender California State Bar No. 343104 5 411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 6 (702) 388-6577 7 Shelly_Richter@fd.org 8 *Attorney for Petitioner Roger Randolph 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 Roger Randolph, 13 Case No. 2:18-cv-00449-RFB-VCF Petitioner, 14 Order v. 15 Renee Baker, et al., 16 17 Respondents. 18 Upon review of the record filed for this habeas matter and petitioner’s 19 unopposed motion, the Court notes the parties omitted the sealed hearing transcript 20 for the state district court’s Young v. State, 102 P.3d 572 (Nev. 2004) hearing. ECF 21 No. 80 at 13 n.2; Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 7; Nasby v. McDaniel, 22 853 F.3d 1049, 1052-54 (9th Cir. 2017) (remanding to the district court with 23 instructions to consider the entire state court record). 24 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 25 1. Within 45 days of the entry of this order, respondents must file with 26 the Court either a supplemental “Exhibit 266,” consisting of the February 16 or 17, 27 1| | 2011, sealed hearing transcript in petitioner’s underlying state-court matter, or a notice indicating the sealed transcript is unavailable. 3 2. Petitioner will have 10 days after respondents file a response to this 4|| order to admit or deny the correctness of respondents’ filing. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 4 S 7

9 10 11 Dated: January 9, 2024. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27