Randolph Jackson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Randolph Jackson v. State of Florida

194 So. 3d 579, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10369, 2016 WL 3611007

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 6, 2016

Docket1D16-1003, 1D16-1010

StatusPublished

This text of 194 So. 3d 579 (Randolph Jackson v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randolph Jackson v. State of Florida, 194 So. 3d 579, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10369, 2016 WL 3611007 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as unauthorized. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

Due to petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his repeated pro se filings attacking his judgments and sentences in Alachua County Circuit Court ease numbers 01-2003-CF-2475-A and 01-2003-CF-003477-A, this court issued an order directing petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 761 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla.1999). Petitioner has failed to respond.

As such, because petitioner’s continued and repeated attacks on his conviction and sentence have become an abuse of the legal process, we hold that he is barred from future pro se filings in this court concerning Alachua County Circuit Court case numbers 01-2003-CF-2475-A and 01-2003-CF-003477-A. The Clerk of the Court is directed not to accept any future filings concerning these cases unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. Petitioner is warned that any filings that violate the terms of this opinion may result in a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2015). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as unauthorized. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

Due to petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his repeated pro se filings attacking his judgments and sentences in Alachua County Circuit Court ease numbers 01-2003-CF-2475-A and 01-2003-CF-003477-A, this court issued an order directing petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 761 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla.1999). Petitioner has failed to respond.

As such, because petitioner’s continued and repeated attacks on his conviction and sentence have become an abuse of the legal process, we hold that he is barred from future pro se filings in this court concerning Alachua County Circuit Court case numbers 01-2003-CF-2475-A and 01-2003-CF-003477-A. The Clerk of the Court is directed not to accept any future filings concerning these cases unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. Petitioner is warned that any filings that violate the terms of this opinion may result in a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2015). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 So. 3d 579, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10369, 2016 WL 3611007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randolph-jackson-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack