Randolph Frodsham v. Cir

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: December 27, 2010
• Docket: 09-70220
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDOLPH FRODSHAM, No. 09-70220

Petitioner - Appellant, Tax Ct. No. 13980-07L

v. MEMORANDUM * COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court

Submitted December 14, 2010 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Randolph Frodsham appeals pro se from the tax court’s order dismissing for

failure to prosecute his petition contesting the Commissioner’s issuance of a Notice

of Determination sustaining a tax lien against him to collect purported income tax

liabilities for tax years 2003 and 2004. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 7482(a)(1). We review for an abuse of discretion. Edelson v. Comm’r, 829 F.2d

828, 831 (9th Cir. 1987). We affirm.

The tax court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Frodsham’s petition

for failure to prosecute because Frodsham failed to appear for trial and provided no

legitimate excuse for his failure to appear. See id. (holding that the tax court did

not abuse its discretion by dismissing the taxpayers’ petitions for failure to

prosecute where the taxpayers had, among other things, failed to appear for trial).

Frodsham’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

2 09-70220