Randolph E. Lynch v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Randolph E. Lynch v. United States

310 F.2d 864, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 59

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 21, 1962

Docket16877

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 310 F.2d 864 (Randolph E. Lynch v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randolph E. Lynch v. United States, 310 F.2d 864, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 59 (D.C. Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of rape, and sentenced to imprisonment for a term •of one to four years. We have carefully considered the contentions made by his able court-appointed counsel, and especially whether the story of the complaining witness was sufficiently corroborated. But we have concluded that it was, and 'that the instructions to the jury in this respect were not prejudicial to the accused, under all the circumstances. On the -whole case, we find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of rape, and sentenced to imprisonment for a term •of one to four years. We have carefully considered the contentions made by his able court-appointed counsel, and especially whether the story of the complaining witness was sufficiently corroborated. But we have concluded that it was, and 'that the instructions to the jury in this respect were not prejudicial to the accused, under all the circumstances. On the -whole case, we find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

310 F.2d 864, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randolph-e-lynch-v-united-states-cadc-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack