Randles v. Randles

39 Ind. 555

• Court: Indiana Supreme Court
• Decided: May 15, 1872
• Status: Published

Opinion

Downey, J.

The only question made in this case is as to the sufficiency of the complaint. It is as follows-:

"The State of Indiana, Tippecanoe County, ss. In the Common Pleas Court.- To the November term, 1869.

W. D. Lee and P. H. Lee, for appellant. W. C. Wilson, for appellee.

“ Peter Randles, plaintiff, complains of Benjamin Randles, defendant, and says that the defendant, on the-day of -, by his note, a copy of which is filed herewith,' promised to pay Peter Randles - dollars and - cents, which remains unpaid; and the plaintiff claims judgment for five hundred dollars. Other relief.

“W. C. Wilson, Attorney for Plaintiff.”

Neither the note nor a copy of it was filed with the complaint.

We think the complaint was insufficient.

The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded.