Randle v. State

897 So. 2d 554, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4684, 2005 WL 771589
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Randle v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9435
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 2005·No. No. 1D04-3661·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gerome Darell Randle petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that he is entitled to pre-trial release on reasonable conditions and that the monetary bail set by the trial court is excessive and unreasonable in the circumstances. The State of Florida, in its response to the petition, asserts without contradiction that material facts which were presented to the trial court at the hearing on Randle’s motion for bond reduction have substantially changed in that Randle was discharged from the United States Navy in the interim. We agree and find that this proceeding is essentially moot as a consequence, and deny the petition for that reason.

PETITION DENIED.

WEBSTER, BENTON and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Randle v. State, 897 So. 2d 554, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4684, 2005 WL 771589 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

897 So. 2d 554 (Randle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.