Randle v. Randle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Randle v. Randle

274 So. 2d 557, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7172

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 6, 1973

DocketNo. 72-1372

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 274 So. 2d 557 (Randle v. Randle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randle v. Randle, 274 So. 2d 557, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7172 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal is from an order of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, denying appellants’ motion to amend their answer and add a counterclaim which was filed two and one-half years after their original answer, and just prior to a hearing on a motion for summary judgment.

Appellants contend that the court abused its direction in refusing to allow the additional pleadings.

We have considered the record on appeal, briefs and arguments of counsel and have concluded that no abuse of discretion has been made to appear.

As this court and other appellate courts have held, where no such showing is made the ruling of the trial judge will not be disturbed. 2765 South Bayshore Drive Corp. v. Fred Howland, Inc., Fla.App. 1968, 212 So.2d 911; United States v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 179 So.2d 890; Corbett v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Fla.App. 1964, 166 So.2d 196.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI