Randle v. Huntley
194 So. 2d 646
This text of 194 So. 2d 646 (Randle v. Huntley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Randle v. Huntley, 194 So. 2d 646 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
Opinion
Affirmed upon authority of Rivers v. Brown, 62 Fla. 258, 56 So. 553 (1911); Forbes v. Ft. Lauderdale Mercantile Co., 83 Fla. 66, 90 So. 821 (1922) ; Fannin v. Fritter, 127 Fla. 97, 172 So. 691 (1937); Rothstein v. Forty-Five, Twenty-Five, Inc., Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 565.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fannin v. Fritter
172 So. 691 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Rothstein v. Forty-Five, Twenty-Five, Inc.
145 So. 2d 565 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Rivers v. Brown
62 Fla. 258 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1911)
Forbes v. Fort Lauderdale Mercantile Co.
90 So. 821 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
194 So. 2d 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randle-v-huntley-fladistctapp-1967.