Randle v. Huntley
194 So. 2d 646
Opinion
Affirmed upon authority of Rivers v. Brown, 62 Fla. 258, 56 So. 553 (1911); Forbes v. Ft. Lauderdale Mercantile Co., 83 Fla. 66, 90 So. 821 (1922) ; Fannin v. Fritter, 127 Fla. 97, 172 So. 691 (1937); Rothstein v. Forty-Five, Twenty-Five, Inc., Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 565.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Randle v. Huntley, 194 So. 2d 646 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
194 So. 2d 646 (Randle v. Huntley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fannin v. Fritter
172 So. 691 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Rothstein v. Forty-Five, Twenty-Five, Inc.
145 So. 2d 565 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Rivers v. Brown
62 Fla. 258 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1911)
Forbes v. Fort Lauderdale Mercantile Co.
90 So. 821 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1922)