Randi v. State
This text of 538 So. 2d 976 (Randi v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant correctly contends that the three year sentence of incarceration for the crime of grand theft committed September 25, 1981 should not have been a guidelines sentence because he did not affirmatively select to be sentenced under the guidelines. On the contrary, the record affirmatively shows that appellant rejected a guidelines sentence. Therefore, appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence should have been granted to reflect that his sentence was a non-guidelines sentence, and the order appealed from is modified to that extent. Except as so modified, the order denying relief is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
538 So. 2d 976, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 529, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 897, 1989 WL 13618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randi-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.