Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Randazzo v. Oberoi

Randazzo v. Oberoi

126 A.D.2d 972, 511 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42087
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 23, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D.2d 972 (Randazzo v. Oberoi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Randazzo v. Oberoi, 126 A.D.2d 972, 511 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42087 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated at Special Term, Gossel, J. Memorandum: We add only that the agreement between the parties herein differs substantially from that involved in Zupan v Firestone (91 AD2d 561, affd 59 NY2d 709) relied on by defendant. Nothing in the agreement between plaintiff and defendant could be construed as a waiver by plaintiff of a right to pursue a remedy at law. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J.—dismiss complaint.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zupan v. Firestone
450 N.E.2d 245 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Zupan v. Firestone
91 A.D.2d 561 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 A.D.2d 972, 511 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randazzo-v-oberoi-nyappdiv-1987.