Randall v. Worthington

141 Ala. 497
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1904·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

SHARPE, J.

A judge granting a new1 trial is matter of record in the trial court, and on appeal therefrom the judgment should appear either in the transcript of the record proper, or be set out in the bill of exceptions in accordance with section 434 of the Code of 1896. Nowhere in the transcript submitted on this appeal is there such a judgment set out. The statement contained in the bill of exceptions that “the court granted said motion and set aside the verdict of the jury and granted the defendant a new trial,” is insufficient to present a judgment for review.

Therefore, the appeal must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Randall v. Worthington, 141 Ala. 497 (Ala. 1904).

141 Ala. 497 (Randall v. Worthington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Griffin
201 So. 2d 100 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1967)
Ex Parte Brandon
11 So. 2d 561 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1943)
Sanford v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee
156 So. 858 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1934)
Clements v. Hodgens
98 So. 467 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)
Dees v. Lindsey Mill Co.
97 So. 647 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)
Irby v. Kaigler
60 So. 418 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)
Lasseter v. Deas
57 So. 49 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1911)
O'Brien v. Brewer
56 So. 49 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1911)