Randall v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Randall v. Superior Court

124 P. 1058, 19 Cal. App. 184

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 27, 1912

DocketCiv. No. 1197.

StatusPublished

This text of 124 P. 1058 (Randall v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randall v. Superior Court, 124 P. 1058, 19 Cal. App. 184 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

It appears from the record, files and papers herein that the notice of exception to the sufficiency of the sureties was duly given and made on the 22d of March, 1912; that the notice for the justification of the sureties and the time set therefor was the twenty-ninth day of March, more than five days after service of the notice of exception. This was beyond the time authorized by the statute, and such notice was ineffectual to preserve the rights of the parties upon the appeal. It is, therefore, ordered that the writ be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appears from the record, files and papers herein that the notice of exception to the sufficiency of the sureties was duly given and made on the 22d of March, 1912; that the notice for the justification of the sureties and the time set therefor was the twenty-ninth day of March, more than five days after service of the notice of exception. This was beyond the time authorized by the statute, and such notice was ineffectual to preserve the rights of the parties upon the appeal. It is, therefore, ordered that the writ be denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 P. 1058, 19 Cal. App. 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-v-superior-court-calctapp-1912.