Randall v. State

352 So. 2d 566, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16799
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 1977·No. No. 77-851·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section [567]*567921.161(1) Florida Statutes. Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).

Remanded for correction of the sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Randall v. State, 352 So. 2d 566, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16799 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

352 So. 2d 566 (Randall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boshears v. State
371 So. 2d 725 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)