Randall v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Randall v. State

151 So. 926, 26 Ala. App. 679

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 28, 1933

Docket5 Div. 910.

StatusPublished

This text of 151 So. 926 (Randall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randall v. State, 151 So. 926, 26 Ala. App. 679 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The indictment in this case charged this appellant, Isaac Randall, together with Ed Randall, Sr., Clem Randall, and Ed Randall, Jr., with the offense of assault with intent to murder Austin Newman. A severance was demanded by defendant (appellant) and granted by the court. The trial resulted in the conviction of Isaac Randall as charged in the indictment, whereupon the court, as the law requires, fixed his punishment, and sentenced him to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than seven years nor more than eight years. From the judgment of conviction this appeal was taken and the appeal here submitted upon the record proper only, there being no bill of exceptions. The regularity of the proceedings as shown by the record is the only ques *680 tion therefore for our consideration on this appeal.

We have examined the record and find it regular in all things. No error thereon being apparent, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The indictment in this case charged this appellant, Isaac Randall, together with Ed Randall, Sr., Clem Randall, and Ed Randall, Jr., with the offense of assault with intent to murder Austin Newman. A severance was demanded by defendant (appellant) and granted by the court. The trial resulted in the conviction of Isaac Randall as charged in the indictment, whereupon the court, as the law requires, fixed his punishment, and sentenced him to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than seven years nor more than eight years. From the judgment of conviction this appeal was taken and the appeal here submitted upon the record proper only, there being no bill of exceptions. The regularity of the proceedings as shown by the record is the only ques *680 tion therefore for our consideration on this appeal.

We have examined the record and find it regular in all things. No error thereon being apparent, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 So. 926, 26 Ala. App. 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-v-state-alactapp-1933.