Randall v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Randall v. Safir

271 A.D.2d 348, 708 N.Y.S.2d 282, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4576

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 348 (Randall v. Safir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randall v. Safir, 271 A.D.2d 348, 708 N.Y.S.2d 282, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered on or about November 19, 1999, which denied petitioner’s applica[349]*349tion made pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s determination terminating petitioner’s employment as a probationary police officer, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This Court has rejected the argument that McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 891 (L 1940, ch 834) precludes a probationary employee from being terminated without a hearing (Matter of Williams v Safir, 265 AD2d 182, lv denied 94 NY2d 758), and we see no reason to depart from that holding. Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Rubin, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered on or about November 19, 1999, which denied petitioner’s applica[349]*349tion made pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s determination terminating petitioner’s employment as a probationary police officer, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This Court has rejected the argument that McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 891 (L 1940, ch 834) precludes a probationary employee from being terminated without a hearing (Matter of Williams v Safir, 265 AD2d 182, lv denied 94 NY2d 758), and we see no reason to depart from that holding. Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Rubin, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 348, 708 N.Y.S.2d 282, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-v-safir-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack