Randall v. Hall
1 Hill & Den. 239
This text of 1 Hill & Den. 239 (Randall v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Randall v. Hall, 1 Hill & Den. 239 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1843).
Opinion
By the Court,
The judgment of the justice was rendered by him in favor of his second cousin. Their consanguinity was, in effect, admitted on the trial. The judgment was void and should have been reversed by the common pleas. (2 R. S., 275, §2; Edwards v. Russell, 21 Wend., 63; Foot v. Morgan, 1 Hill, 654.)
Judgment of the common pleas and of the justice reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Edwards v. Russell
21 Wend. 63 (New York Supreme Court, 1839)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Hill & Den. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-v-hall-nysupct-1843.