Randall v. Geoffrey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Randall v. Geoffrey

205 N.W.2d 164, 57 Wis. 2d 773, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1612

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 27, 1973

DocketNo. 289

StatusPublished

This text of 205 N.W.2d 164 (Randall v. Geoffrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randall v. Geoffrey, 205 N.W.2d 164, 57 Wis. 2d 773, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1612 (Wis. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court has repeatedly and recently stated the rules to be applied when reviewing a complaint attacked by demurrer. See Town of Salem v. Kenosha County, ante, p. 432, 204 N. W. 2d 467, and cases cited therein.

Additionally, on demurrer the facts alleged in the complaint are assumed to be true and the difficulty the plaintiff may have in proving them is immaterial. Ritterbusch v. Ritterbusch (1971), 50 Wis. 2d 633, 184 N. W. 2d 865.

Applying these well-established rules the court concludes on this general demurrer to the complaint that [774]*774the facts alleged are sufficient to state a cause of action on ■ behalf of the plaintiff as assignee against the defendant, the co-assignee, for the proceeds on the note.

The order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI