Randall v. Gene Adams Refrigerated Truck Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Randall v. Gene Adams Refrigerated Truck Service

59 A.D.2d 968, 399 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14229

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 3, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 968 (Randall v. Gene Adams Refrigerated Truck Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randall v. Gene Adams Refrigerated Truck Service, 59 A.D.2d 968, 399 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14229 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed April 3, 1975, as amended by a decision filed October 30, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee holding that claimant had a causally related permanent total disability after October 2, 1974. The board found: "that based on medical evidence in file, especially the C-71 dated 10/2/74, claimant has a total causally related disability, and further examination by the Principal Medical Examiner is not warranted.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed April 3, 1975, as amended by a decision filed October 30, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee holding that claimant had a causally related permanent total disability after October 2, 1974. The board found: "that based on medical evidence in file, especially the C-71 dated 10/2/74, claimant has a total causally related disability, and further examination by the Principal Medical Examiner is not warranted.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 968, 399 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-v-gene-adams-refrigerated-truck-service-nyappdiv-1977.