Randall v. Freed

California Court of Appeal

Randall v. Freed

94 P. 1056, 7 Cal. App. 553

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 15, 1908

DocketCiv. No. 397.

StatusPublished

This text of 94 P. 1056 (Randall v. Freed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randall v. Freed, 94 P. 1056, 7 Cal. App. 553 (Cal. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

The action was brought for damages in the amount of $2,070 for personal injuries. The defendant filed an answer and cross-complaint in which he sought an injunction to restrain plaintiff from the commission of a nuisance. The judgment was in favor of defendant, from which and the order denying her motion for a new trial plaintiff appealed directly to this court.

It is conceded by appellant and it must be so held under article II, section 4 of the constitution, that the appeal should have been taken in the first instance to the supreme court.

The cause is transferred to the supreme court.

Hart, J., and Chipman, P. J., concurred. *Page 554

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The action was brought for damages in the amount of $2,070 for personal injuries. The defendant filed an answer and cross-complaint in which he sought an injunction to restrain plaintiff from the commission of a nuisance. The judgment was in favor of defendant, from which and the order denying her motion for a new trial plaintiff appealed directly to this court.

It is conceded by appellant and it must be so held under article II, section 4 of the constitution, that the appeal should have been taken in the first instance to the supreme court.

The cause is transferred to the supreme court.

Hart, J., and Chipman, P. J., concurred. *Page 554

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 P. 1056, 7 Cal. App. 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-v-freed-calctapp-1908.